From there we have that the specific subjects of the philosophy, not obstante its history, not importing its largeness and magnitude, if will not have to see with the pupil and its life, it will be rejected fixedly, always. Let us say, for example, if she was disciplines it of Portuguese Language the presented liame to make the linking of disciplines studied in room with the life of the pupil is that it needs this every day, to communicate themselves verbally, to write or same to read a statement of any another one disciplines is necessary to know the grammatical rules, syntactic, semantics; then, the Portuguese Language is substantial part of the daily one of the pupil, then this disciplines must be white of interest redoubled on the part of them in the classroom. Duty to be, does not mean, of form some, that effectively either. How to attract the attention of the pupils for disciplines of Mathematics? Simple. It is part of the life, not if she can cross the street without it. When it is looked at for the side and it waits the car to pass stops later crossing the street uses Mathematical it. Calculation of speed and displacement importantssimo for the subsistence, of the opposite, without this calculation the life would be permanently at risk of being run over. In the daily drudgery the Mathematics is necessary in the purchases of supermarket, in the traffic light, among others and therefore the pupils if they interest for disciplines in bonanza way. also therefore that it disciplines it account, in the majority of schools, with four weekly lessons. What I tried to demonstrate above was a reasonable justification offered by the professors of the respective ones disciplines so that the pupils if interest for the content displayed in classroom, is good the justifications, without a doubt, but of the expectation of the professor to the interest of the pupil it has an enormous irrigation ditch, almost unsurmountable.
Before the contemporary capitalist society, in which unhappyly, it is aggravated injustice and the violence, is submitted to the strong imposition of an intrinsic behavior of esteretipos, repleta of socially correct norms, or in really? pseudocorrect. We are coerced to valorar the obsessive materialism, the aesthetic efemeridade, the market competitiveness. Such ideals function as narcotic, in becoming the dependents of momentneas consequences, and when less it expects, we are to act as people who do not know the Christ. Ahead of this chaotic situation it urges to surpass it, and to demonstrate that another world is possible, however, what we are to make to skirt the hostile environment which we inhabit? It will be that we are to be certification of Christ, or to act standards of the world according to? We as young rationals and solcitos, must unconditionally trust God the point of sobrepo-l in any period of training of our life, but for this we interior fit, a critical analysis: Who is God pra you? Its God and Gentleman or only that one that can give you everything what you long for? Some thinkers and scientists had formulated meanings the respect. For Kepler, a mathematical brilliant and luterano astronomer: ' ' God represents the Trindade, that if materialized in the bodies celestiais' ' For precursory Galileu of the Heliocntrismo: ' ' The Bible, and everything that in it is being affirmed, cannot make a mistake, exactly in its minimum details, however what it exists it is the disfigurement to the being interpretada' ' Isaac Newton figure of genius and indisputvel innovation said: ' ' This magnificent system of the sun, planets and comets, could only proceed from the wise advice and domain of an intelligent and powerful, essential Being for the nature and the perfection of the space? Max Planck, known for the Quantum theory, expressed the vision of that God is present in all the places, believed a God beneficient Almighty, onisciente and, even so not necessarily a staff. For Einstein, the known scientist more and highly reverenciado of the century XX, ' ' It is a superior force that if discloses in the harmony and the beauty of natureza' ' for us, that we believe the essence of an alive and personal God? Neutral zone in the scope does not exist spiritual, that is, it has two sides, and we have that to opt to one of them. Or we hug the faith and we live the word of God in obedience It or we at the mercy of do not deliver our lives in Its hands being of the evil in any area of our lives. We have that to assume a side.
E, with this attitude, all the harvested fruits will be pra construction or destruction. Which side you choose? He competes deciding us as to valorar and to love this God who everything can. Hayde M. Blacksmith