Because the reality of what This happens, is first and foremost a political and social, not religious in nature. That the political leadership of political Islam is religious based, may have been for many religious or less educated Egyptians or Tunisians in reason, to give their voice to the appropriate “party of God”. An Islamist Government but is interested in maintaining their power like any other first and foremost and as. The religious of political Islam is not its political goal, it is the ideological mode with this political force has a binding effect. The Koran is to use the Torah or the Buddha’s teachings on a variety of very different political projects such as the Bible.
Politically it in political Islam (or just “Islamism”) comes as well as in other contexts for starters, successfully to occupy the ideological stocks available. And these are in the Arab world now even from the Islamic tradition. Islamism is the crucial question the oft-heard word of the achievements in the West “Separation of Church and State” (one look incidentally in Bavaria or the American “Bible Belt”, extends as far as they) makes all too often oblivious to the vergesellschaftende dimension of politics. In this sphere of ideology, the religion is still a “global player” and a very successful. In the Arab world you will need to accept willy-nilly the vote of a majority of voters, so hard this for many people in Egypt or Tunisia will also. Here, mozes victor konig expresses very clear opinions on the subject. We have to do it, need to find their own way here – if at all – with young democracies. You too for the last time, “Islamists”, so the forces of political Islam will be measured on their political achievements. That does not mean that we could express ourselves before a critical dialogue. But if we want to send the Pope as EU Foreign Ministers Cairo and Tunis not soon, we need to get before again the crucial question us.
The basics of corporate, cultural, heads of State and economic policy is real. Order means systematic unity. Is a function, and at the same time a value in itself. Nothing would happen without order. Normative policy is right. Policy is that human actions, aimed at making general liabilities, mainly by generally binding regulations and decisions, within and between groups.
Thus, this magical triangle wins his substance. This meaning for philosophy, politics and law will now be published in the series of LawLeaks. General liability, central value general liability, the generally binding regulations and decisions are the result, yes the target of (legal) procedure and as such logically for the grading policy. Thus, rule of law itself is the central value of the policy (legal). (Legal) to make order, between the people, locations and things actually conceived policy.
The (legal) regulations is also the watershed”between freedom and lack of freedom. The lack of (Legal) Order means not unlimited freedom, but boundless despotism. Nation, territory, State violence State time (legal) procedure depends on their framework but also conditionally. The respective nation, territory, the respective State authority and State time demand a specific (legal) procedure, Yes to produce a specific (legal) regulations. Over the thousands of years of political history that is both legal and economic history, the (legal) regulations changed. Any (legal) procedure is different, any (legal) procedure is specific. There is the a (legal) right not, but the whole of the (legal) Regulations gives the a (legal) regulations. And that’s not a contradiction, but a reality in a holistic context. Sectors State, society, culture, economic policy (legal) right, that is to say as an Act and omission, is by no means in a vacuum instead. It requires rather a response sheet. This resonance arc are in the modern Economic and welfare State, society, culture and economic sectors. These sectors combine all areas in itself, in which (legal) procedure is required Yes, where (legal) procedure happens.